FKA Copyright Statement
Home    Site Map    Privacy
Search FKA
Search
FKA Newsletter
Login
Password
Clear

FAQs
Answers to 25 of the most popular questions ...more
Clients
A selection of FKA clients and partners ...more
You Say it Best
See what real FKA clients have to say ...more


"By far the best instructor I've ever had the pleasure of learning from. Well Done!"

Mike Creasey
Charon Systems

 


E-mail Here:

FKA Logo
Sept 2007 Friesen, Kaye and Associates

FKA Learning Exchange - Jul/Aug/Sept 2007


in this issue
 



Join our mailing list!

Welcome to the Jul/Aug/Sept 2007 edition of the Learning Exchange - FKA's learning and performance newsletter.

Know someone else who would enjoy the content? Feel free to forward this newsletter using the "Forward Email" link at the bottom of the page!


Learner Interaction - Online and Otherwise


Many of you will be familiar with FKA's insistence upon incorporating interaction into your instructional design and facilitation efforts. We have long used an acronym -VIVE- to represent our beliefs in this area. The acronym stems from the French word 'vive' meaning lively. In short, lively, engaging instruction embodies:

   Variety
   Interaction
   Visuals
   Examples

Respecting the specific theme of interaction we've recently read an interesting article and want to share a review and our thoughts with you.

The article, entitled The Importance of Interaction in Web-Based Education: A Program-level Case Study of Online MBA Courses 1 presents a literature review and research study that explores the importance of interaction in web-based education. The comprehensive literature illuminates the "messy... confusion" between interaction and interactivity that has resulted from the rapid development of computer and Internet technologies into the world of teaching and learning. In general the confusion stems from the fact that some people use the terms interchangeably where others make a distinction between them. The distinction that is drawn, uses 'interaction' to describe more process-oriented activity that is focused on dynamic issues (e.g., questioning or group work) and 'interactivity' to describe more feature-oriented activity that is dependent upon technology (e.g., answering polls, participating in chat). We favor the approach with distinction.

With definitions in place the article then reviews the types of interactions that occur in teaching and learning environments2. The very familiar three part interaction scheme is presented:

  1. learner-instructor,
  2. learner-learner, and
  3. learner-content.
These have long been central themes in our design workshops and, of course, we practice the facilitation of all three in our basic and advanced instructor training workshops. The research cited supports the view that learner-instructor interaction is "essential and desirable by many learners"; that learner-learner interaction is desired by learners; and that learner- content interaction, while well recognized, garners less discussion in the literature. We will continue to support all three themes in our workshops.

Most interestingly, the article presents from the literature a type of interaction that is not as widely discussed: namely, 'vicarious interaction'. Instructors, of course, are very familiar with the vicarious learner who chooses not to overtly engage but who clearly performs at the knowledge or skill level. The research says that these vicarious learners do interact but they do so internally by silently responding to questions or by internally reflecting on discussions that they hear. In the face-to-face environment there are universal and well practiced communication techniques that allow us to identify and respect the vicarious style - sometimes ''drawing-in' less participative learners, and sometimes not. When these vicarious learners move into the online environments they do not change their interaction styles - choosing, for example, to observe rather than actively participate in online discussions and debates, or choosing not to access the questioning functions or to participate in chat. In online environments (both asynchronous and synchronous) vicarious learners are sometimes pejoratively labeled as 'lurkers' even though their style (reading and reflecting on others' input) is no different online from what they practice in the face-to-face environment. What is different online, of course, is the absence of two-way visual cues to guide facilitator actions and, the technologies that available in the software. The report points to bandwith improvements supporting the increased use of streaming video and video conferencing to help in this area. We look forward to further research.

With respect to technologies that aid the general learner population the research shows that while there are numerous technologies available to promote interaction, the overall lack of training and preparation for online instructors means that many of these technologies are not being used. Aggravating this lack of formal training is the tendency of online instructors to "translate more often than to transform" when they move online. In effect this attitude - which says "this is what I do in the classroom, so how do I repeat that in the virtual environment" - limits the learning experience. Encouragingly, the research also notes innovative encouraging exceptions to this general rule and points to the use of virtual office hours, online cafés, expert chats and online introduction forums as examples.

Overall though, and accepting the inexorable growth in online learning, the research calls for increased support for formal instructor training and preparation. FKA, through our Facilitating e- Learning and Presenting Over the Web workshops, has been contributing to the development of online instructors and presenters for several years. Additionally, we have migrated several elements of our methodology to an online format in both asynchronous and synchronous formats making it possible for us to offer our design workshops in a blended format. Most recently we've been offering our Effective Assessment workshop online and efforts are ongoing to develop online offerings of the Needs Identification phase of our instructional systems design methodology. We'll strive to be innovative with our designs and look forward to updating you on these new offerings in the near future.


1. The Importance of Interaction in Web-Based Education: A Program-level Case Study of Online MBA Courses; Bude Su, Curtis J. Bonk, Richard J. Magjuka, Xiaojing Lui, Seung-hee Lee, Journal of Interative Online Learning, Volume 4, Number 1 Summer 2005 (ISSN:1541-4914)
2. While the perspective is an online perspective we do note that elements of the literature review preceded the 'on-line explosion' and that many of the on-line interaction 'types' have been appropriated from the traditional face-to-face environment. This, in turn, reminds us of other research that shows that teachers and instructors, rather than approach the on-line strategy creatively, tend to simply transform their familiar face-to-face methods to the online environment. But that's a subject for another newsletter perhaps.


NEW!! - Effective Assessment Workshop


Online or Face-to-Face

We have always held that the minimum standard against which Instructional Designers ought to measure themselves is the validity and reliability of the Level 2 assessments that they create for their learners. One way of putting that into perspective is to ask: "When my learners return to the workplace will their managers perceive them to be prepared to perform to the agreed standard?" Over the last few years, again in response to client demand, we have piloted and refined a dedicated Level 2 knowledge and performance workshop. A detailed description of the workshop can be found at the following link.

Effective Assessment

The workshop is available in both public and on-site venues.


Tip of the Month


Promoting Interaction in Facilitated Face-to- Face or Online Lessons

We all know that interaction is the goal of instructional design and delivery. If it is so obvious, can we assume it will happen automatically? Of course not! Instructional designers and facilitators must always keep this goal in mind. This is especially true for online lessons where more planning may be needed.

We created the following tips for online lessons, but many of them apply to the traditional leader-led class as well.

Design Tips:

  • Variety - Plan a variety of methods and materials and change them frequently to keep the learners' attention. Try to use presentation methods that support interaction, e.g., brainstorming instead of lecture.
  • Interaction - Include as many types of interaction as possible: Learner-Facilitator, Learner- Learner, Learner-Content. Design questions that maximize learner involvement.
  • Visuals - Plan visuals to: clarify difficult concepts, add interest and aid retention.
  • Examples - Include relevant workplace examples so learners know why it is important and how they will be able to use it back on the job. Engaged learners will be more actively involved.
  • Plan small group activities to promote Learner-Learner interaction and add variety. Make sure you understand all the features and functions of the technology so you can take full advantage of them.

Delivery Tips:

  • Establish interaction early and make it the norm.
  • Make learners comfortable with the technology and establish ground rules for interaction. See below.
  • Respond positively to learner-generated interaction.
  • Ask questions that allow learners to participate in building the content. In other words, capitalize on everything learners can offer: facts, ideas, opinions, experiences/previous knowledge and examples.
  • Use a variety of technical features, depending on the situation. Do you want learners to be able to respond anonymously? Individually? All at once? In text or voice? See figure 1 and figure 2.
  • Establish learner motivation early and keep reinforcing it.

Ground Rules for Interaction

Consider establishing ground rules for the following:

1) When learner questions are welcome

  • Anytime
  • At pre-planned intervals
  • At end of session
2) Scope of learner questions and examples
  • On topic throughout session
  • Wider scope at end of session
  • Use of parking lot
3) Use of Raise Hand
  • In response to a question from the facilitator
  • Whenever participants wish to speak
4) Telephone/VoIP etiquette for learners
  • When individually called upon by facilitator
  • During a round-table discussion See figure 1
  • Identification of speaker
  • Brevity
  • Ambient noise muted when not speaking
5) Use of chat by learners
  • Enabled during session
  • Disabled during session, enabled near
  • Private chat enabled, public chat disabled
6) Use of annotation tools by learners
  • Anytime
  • In response to a question or instruction from the facilitator. See figure 2.


Final Thoughts by Michael Nolan
Mike




Our newsletter this month deals with learner interaction -- online and otherwise. FKA continues to work closely with our customers to ensure that the types of interactions they use during training, lend themselves to achieving the learning objectives of the program. Then with the appropriate bridging strategies in place the learners will also achieve the final performance objectives.

Our experience, however, suggests many organizations unfortunately assess learners during the training program at a lower level of skill and knowledge than perhaps is required back on the job. During training, we frequently see that learners are asked recall and recognition type questions that only assess basic knowledge and comprehension. Back on the job they must actually be able to apply the skill and knowledge to various situations; use it to analyze new situations; synthesize it with old and new information; or even use it to evaluate other processes and ideas.

For learning programs to be effective, they must ensure that learners leave with the requisite skills to perform successfully on the job. In short, if at the end of training we want to be able to predict success back on the job, we must include in our final assessments questions that more closely align with the final performance objectives.

Michael Nolan
President


Recommended Resource


No time for a workshop, or just need to brush up on your classroom delivery skills? Use FKA's Trainer Certification Coach. This robust CD-based learning tool combines real classroom video with an interactive interface showcasing the skills and competencies of excellent instructors. View two different styles of lesson, as well as pre and post training activities! A self- assessment guide is also included. Regular price $99, special Learning Exchange price of $49.95 (plus shipping and handling). Click Coach to order today!


Other Items


Become a member! Join other savvy learning and performance professionals in the know and become an FKA Member. Membership is f r e e, and it gives you access to the special members area of the FKA website. This area is loaded with tips, tricks, articles, forums and more. Become a member today! http://www.fka.com/megabbs/register.asp

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Attention meeting planners: looking for dynamic speakers for your upcoming company event? Consider an FKA expert. We can speak on a wide variety of training, learning and performance topics in an interactive and learner-centered format. Call us at 1-800-352-5585 or 613-829-3412.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If you like these tips, please forward them on to your colleagues, clients and friends using the "Forward Email" link at the bottom of the page.

Don’t forget to become an FKA Member for access to lots more great training, learning and performance information: http://www.fka.com



Menu
  www.fka.com   about us      consulting      workshops      e-learning      resources      contacts  
Copyright © Friesen, Kaye and Associates, 2005. All Rights Reserved 1-800-FKA-5585